<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rfc ipr="trust200902" submissionType="IETF" category="exp"
     docName="draft-maurette-hmtftp-02" updates="" obsoletes="">
  
  
  <front>
    
    
    <title abbrev="HMTFTP v0.2">HMTFTP: HMAC-Derived TFTP with Optional AEAD Protection (v0.2)</title>
    

    
    <author fullname="A. Maurette" initials="A." surname="Maurette">
      
      
      <organization>IUT R&amp;T Béthune</organization>
      
      
      <address>
        
        
        <postal>
          
          
          <country>France</country>
          
        
        </postal>
        
        
        <email>contact@c4tz.fr</email>
        
      
      </address>
      
    
    </author>
    

    
    <date year="2026" month="January" day="18"/>
    

    
    <area>Applications</area>
    
    
    <workgroup/>
    
    
    <keyword>hmtftp</keyword>
    
    
    <keyword>tftp</keyword>
    
    
    <keyword>aead</keyword>
    
    
    <keyword>hkdf</keyword>
    

    
    <abstract>
      
      
      <t>HMTFTP is a lightweight UDP file transfer protocol that preserves the simplicity of TFTP (block-and-ACK) while adding a structured TLV extension mechanism and an optional authenticated-encryption mode. When negotiated, DATA payloads are protected with AEAD AES-256-GCM and keys are derived with HKDF-SHA-256 from a pre-shared key (PSK). The default UDP port is TBD (requested: 6369) and implementations MUST allow it to be configured.</t>
      
    
    </abstract>
    

    
    <!-- NOTE: xml2rfc auto-generates "Status of This Memo" for Internet-Drafts.
         We keep your text unchanged, but give it a different title to avoid duplication. -->
    <note title="Additional Status Note">
      
      
      <t>
        This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
        provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
      </t>
      
      
      <t>
        Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task
        Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working
        documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is
        at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
      </t>
      
      
      <t>
        Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
        and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
        time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material
        or to cite them other than as &quot;work in progress.&quot;
      </t>
      
    
    </note>
    
  
  </front>
  

  
  <middle>
    

    
    <section title="Introduction">
      
      
      <t>
        
        The Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP) 
        <xref target="RFC1350"/>
         is
        extremely simple but provides no built-in security properties.
        HMTFTP retains the TFTP operational model (UDP, numbered blocks, ACKs)
        while introducing (1) a compact TLV extension mechanism and (2) an
        optional AEAD protection mode for DATA payloads.
      
      </t>
      
      
      <t>
        
        The name &quot;HMTFTP&quot; reflects that cryptographic keys are derived using
        HKDF, a HMAC-based key derivation function 
        <xref target="RFC5869"/>
        .
        This version (v0.2) focuses on removing specification blockers:
        well-defined extension processing rules and explicit security boundaries
        (what is encrypted vs. authenticated).
      
      </t>
      
    
    </section>
    

    
    <section title="Conventions and Terminology">
      
      
      <t>
        
        The key words &quot;MUST&quot;, &quot;MUST NOT&quot;, &quot;REQUIRED&quot;, &quot;SHALL&quot;, &quot;SHALL NOT&quot;,
        &quot;SHOULD&quot;, &quot;SHOULD NOT&quot;, &quot;RECOMMENDED&quot;, &quot;MAY&quot;, and &quot;OPTIONAL&quot; in this
        document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14
        (
        <xref target="RFC2119"/>
         and 
        <xref target="RFC8174"/>
        ) when, and only
        when, they appear in all capitals.
      
      </t>
      

      
      <t>
        This document uses the following terms:
      </t>
      
      
      <list style="symbols">
        
        
        <t>
          <strong>PSK</strong>
          : pre-shared key
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          <strong>AEAD</strong>
          : authenticated encryption with associated data
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          <strong>AAD</strong>
          : additional authenticated data
        </t>
        
      
      </list>
      
    
    </section>
    

    
    <section title="Relationship to TFTP">
      
      
      <t>
        
        HMTFTP is derived from TFTP 
        <xref target="RFC1350"/>
         and reuses the
        core message types and semantics (RRQ, WRQ, DATA, ACK, ERROR). It also
        reuses the concept of an explicit option acknowledgment, OACK, as
        introduced by TFTP option extension 
        <xref target="RFC2347"/>
        . HMTFTP
        replaces the key/value option encoding of RFC 2347 with a TLV encoding
        defined in this document.
      
      </t>
      
      
      <t>
        HMTFTP differs from baseline TFTP primarily by:
      </t>
      
      
      <list style="symbols">
        
        
        <t>using UDP port TBD by default (requested: 6369; configurable), rather than 69;</t>
        
        
        <t>allowing TLV extensions in RRQ, WRQ, and OACK;</t>
        
        
        <t>supporting an optional AEAD security mode for DATA payloads.</t>
        
      
      </list>
      
    
    </section>
    

    
    <section title="Transport">
      
      
      <t>
        HMTFTP runs over UDP. The default server port is TBD (requested: 6369), but
        implementations MUST allow the port to be configured.
      </t>
      
      
      <t>
        
        As in TFTP, a transfer is conducted between a client and a server
        transfer address (IP, UDP port). The server MAY respond from a
        different UDP port than the configured well-known port for the remainder
        of the transfer, as described in 
        <xref target="RFC1350"/>
        .
      
      </t>
      
    
    </section>
    

    
    <section title="Message Formats">
      
      
      <t>
        All multi-octet fields are encoded in network byte order (big-endian).
        HMTFTP reuses the TFTP base message formats, with TLVs appended to RRQ,
        WRQ, and OACK. TLVs are not used in DATA, ACK, or ERROR in v0.2.
      </t>
      

      
      <section title="RRQ and WRQ">
        
        
        <t>
          
          RRQ and WRQ are defined as in 
          <xref target="RFC1350"/>
          :
        
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          
          
          <strong>RRQ/WRQ</strong>
           = OpCode (2) || Filename (N) || 0 || Mode (M) || 0 || [TLVs]
        
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          The optional TLV sequence, when present, begins immediately after the
          terminating zero octet of the Mode field and continues to the end of
          the UDP datagram. The Mode is a NUL-terminated ASCII string (e.g.,
          &quot;octet&quot;).
        </t>
        
      
      </section>
      

      
      <section title="OACK">
        
        
        <t>
          
          OACK is used by the server to acknowledge and/or modify the TLVs
          offered in RRQ/WRQ. OACK is defined by 
          <xref target="RFC2347"/>
           as
          OpCode value 6. In HMTFTP, OACK contains only a TLV sequence:
        
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          
          
          <strong>OACK</strong>
           = OpCode (2) || TLVs
        
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          An OACK with an empty TLV sequence indicates acceptance with no
          negotiated parameters.
        </t>
        
      
      </section>
      

      
      <section title="DATA and ACK">
        
        
        <t>
          
          DATA and ACK are as defined in 
          <xref target="RFC1350"/>
          :
        
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          
          
          <strong>DATA</strong>
           = OpCode (2) || Block (2) || Payload (0..n)
        
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          
          
          <strong>ACK</strong>
           = OpCode (2) || Block (2)
        
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          
          When AEAD protection is negotiated (
          <xref target="security-mode"/>
          ),
          the DATA Payload is structured as: Ciphertext || Tag, where Tag is a
          16-octet AES-GCM authentication tag. The ciphertext length is the
          datagram length minus 4 octets of header and minus 16 octets of tag.
        
        </t>
        
      
      </section>
      

      
      <section title="ERROR">
        
        
        <t>
          
          ERROR is as defined in 
          <xref target="RFC1350"/>
          :
        
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          
          
          <strong>ERROR</strong>
           = OpCode (2) || ErrorCode (2) || ErrMsg (string) || 0
        
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          HMTFTP endpoints SHOULD use an ERROR with ErrorCode 0 (&quot;Not defined&quot;)
          for extension processing failures (e.g., unsupported critical TLV).
        </t>
        
      
      </section>
      
    
    </section>
    

    
    <section title="TLV Encoding and Processing">
      
      
      <t>
        HMTFTP TLVs extend RRQ, WRQ, and OACK. TLVs use a compact binary
        encoding:
      </t>
      

      
      <texttable anchor="tlv-format-table" title="TLV Format">
        
        
        <ttcol align="left">Field</ttcol>
        
        
        <ttcol align="left">Size</ttcol>
        
        
        <ttcol align="left">Description</ttcol>
        
        
        <c>Type</c>
        <c>16 bits</c>
        <c>Type code with Critical bit in MSB</c>
        
        
        <c>Length</c>
        <c>16 bits</c>
        <c>Length of Value in octets</c>
        
        
        <c>Value</c>
        <c>variable</c>
        <c>Type-specific data</c>
        
      
      </texttable>
      

      
      <t>
        
        The most significant bit (MSB) of the Type field is the 
        <em>Critical</em>
        
        bit. Bits 0-14 form the 15-bit TLV code. The Critical bit is not part
        of any future registry code space that may be defined for TLV codes.
      
      </t>
      

      
      <t>
        Processing rules:
      </t>
      
      
      <list style="symbols">
        
        
        <t>
          A receiver MUST ignore unknown TLVs with Critical=0.
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          A receiver that encounters an unknown TLV with Critical=1 MUST
          reject the message by sending an ERROR (and MUST NOT proceed with
          the transfer).
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          A receiver MAY accept known TLVs in any order. If a TLV appears
          multiple times, a receiver SHOULD treat this as an error unless the
          TLV definition explicitly allows repetition.
        </t>
        
      
      </list>

      
      <section anchor="defined-tlvs" title="Defined TLVs">
        
        
        <t>
          This specification defines the following TLVs. All multi-octet values are encoded in
          network byte order (big-endian).
        </t>

        
        <texttable anchor="defined-tlvs-table" title="Defined TLVs (v0.2)">
          
          
          <ttcol align="left">Code</ttcol>
          <ttcol align="left">Name</ttcol>
          <ttcol align="left">Length</ttcol>
          <ttcol align="left">Description</ttcol>

          
          <c>0x0001</c>
          <c>BLKSIZE</c>
          <c>2</c>
          <c>Requested maximum DATA payload size in octets (uint16). If offered by a client, the server MUST respond with BLKSIZE in OACK with the selected value, which MUST be less than or equal to the requested value.</c>

          
          <c>0x0002</c>
          <c>TIMEOUT</c>
          <c>2</c>
          <c>Requested retransmission timeout in seconds (uint16). If offered by a client, the server MUST respond with TIMEOUT in OACK with the selected value (which MAY be less than the requested value) or reject the request.</c>

          
          <c>0x0003</c>
          <c>TSIZE</c>
          <c>8</c>
          <c>Transfer size in octets (uint64). In RRQ, a client MAY send TSIZE=0 to request that the server return the size. In WRQ, a client SHOULD send TSIZE with the size if known.</c>

          
          <c>0x0010</c>
          <c>ENC_REQ</c>
          <c>0</c>
          <c>Request to enable AEAD protection for DATA payloads. Clients that require security mode MUST set the Critical bit on ENC_REQ. Servers that accept security mode MUST echo ENC_REQ in OACK.</c>

          
          <c>0x0011</c>
          <c>CIPHER</c>
          <c>2</c>
          <c>Select ciphersuite (uint16). If omitted, the default ciphersuite is 0x0001 (AES-256-GCM).</c>

          
          <c>0x0012</c>
          <c>CNONCE</c>
          <c>16</c>
          <c>Client nonce (16 octets) generated by a CSPRNG. CNONCE MUST be present in RRQ/WRQ when ENC_REQ is present.</c>

          
          <c>0x0013</c>
          <c>SNONCE</c>
          <c>16</c>
          <c>Server nonce (16 octets) generated by a CSPRNG. SNONCE MUST be present in OACK when ENC_REQ is accepted.</c>
          
        
        </texttable>

        
        <t>
          The ciphersuite value 0x0001 corresponds to AEAD AES-256-GCM.
        </t>
        
      
      </section>
      
    
    </section>
    

    
    <section anchor="procedure" title="Transfer Procedure">
      
      
      <t>
        
        HMTFTP uses the following procedure, aligned with TFTP option
        negotiation 
        <xref target="RFC2347"/>
        :
      
      </t>
      

      
      <list style="numbers">
        
        
        <t>
          The client sends RRQ or WRQ, optionally with TLVs.
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          If the server accepts the request and any offered parameters, it
          replies with OACK containing the negotiated TLVs (which MAY be empty).
          If the server does not support a critical TLV or rejects parameters,
          it replies with ERROR.
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          For RRQ: the client sends ACK(0) after receiving OACK, then the server
          starts with DATA(1).
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          For WRQ: the client starts with DATA(1) after receiving OACK, and the
          server acknowledges each block with ACK(n).
        </t>
        
      
      </list>
      

      
      <t>
        
        Apart from the OACK exchange, block numbering, retransmissions, and EOF
        signaling follow 
        <xref target="RFC1350"/>
        .
      
      </t>
      
    
    </section>
    

    
    <section anchor="security-mode" title="Optional AEAD Security Mode">
      
      
      <t>
        
        Security mode is negotiated using TLVs in RRQ/WRQ and OACK. When enabled,
        each DATA payload is protected with AEAD AES-256-GCM 
        <xref target="RFC5116"/>
        .
        The AEAD key and IV base are derived using HKDF-SHA-256 
        <xref target="RFC5869"/>
        .
      
      </t>
      

      
      <section title="Negotiation TLVs">
        
        
        <t>
          The client requests security mode by including TLV ENC_REQ in RRQ/WRQ.
          When ENC_REQ is present, the client MUST include CNONCE and MAY include CIPHER.
          If the server accepts, it includes ENC_REQ and SNONCE in OACK and MAY include (or echo) CIPHER.
          If the server does not support security mode, it MUST reject a Critical ENC_REQ with ERROR.
        </t>
        
      
      </section>
      

      
      <section title="Key Derivation">
        
        
        <t>
          This document assumes an externally provisioned PSK (32 octets RECOMMENDED).
          During negotiation, the client and server exchange nonces:
          CNONCE and SNONCE, each 16 octets from a CSPRNG.
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          The AEAD key material is derived as follows:
        </t>
        
        
        <list style="symbols">
          
          
          <t>IKM = PSK</t>
          
          
          <t>salt = CNONCE || SNONCE (32 octets)</t>
          
          
          <t>info = &quot;hmtftp v0.2 keys&quot;</t>
          
          
          <t>OKM = HKDF-SHA-256(IKM, salt, info, 44)</t>
          
          
          <t>key = OKM[0..31] (32 octets)</t>
          
          
          <t>iv_base = OKM[32..43] (12 octets)</t>
          
        
        </list>
        
      
      </section>
      

      
      <section title="Nonce Construction and AAD">
        
        
        <t>
          
          The AES-GCM nonce (12 octets) for DATA block number 
          <em>n</em>
           is:
        
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          nonce = iv_base[0..7] || uint32(n)
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          where uint32(n) is the 32-bit big-endian encoding of the DATA block
          number (n is the 16-bit Block field widened to 32 bits).
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          The AEAD AAD is the 4-octet DATA header (OpCode || Block). RRQ/WRQ/OACK
          metadata and TLVs are not encrypted and are not included in the DATA
          AAD in v0.2.
        </t>
        
        
        <t>
          Retransmissions MUST retransmit the exact same ciphertext and tag for
          a given block number (key, nonce).
        </t>
        
      
      </section>
      

      
      <section title="Limits">
        
        
        <t>
          To avoid nonce reuse, endpoints MUST NOT allow the 16-bit block number
          to wrap within a security context. Implementations SHOULD terminate a
          transfer with ERROR well before wrap if it would be reached.
        </t>
        
      
      </section>
      
    
    </section>
    

    
    <section title="Security Considerations">
      
      
      <t>
        
        Without security mode, HMTFTP provides no confidentiality or integrity
        beyond UDP checksums and is vulnerable to on-path modification and
        spoofing, as with TFTP 
        <xref target="RFC1350"/>
        .
      
      </t>
      
      
      <t>
        With security mode enabled, only DATA payloads are encrypted and
        authenticated. RRQ/WRQ/OACK metadata and TLVs remain in cleartext. This
        means filenames, modes, and negotiated parameters are observable on the
        wire. Deployments that require metadata confidentiality MUST avoid
        placing sensitive data in RRQ/WRQ/OACK and SHOULD use an external secure
        channel or a future extension that encrypts metadata.
      </t>
      
      
      <t>
        
        Nonce reuse with AES-GCM is catastrophic. Implementations MUST enforce
        nonce uniqueness and MUST follow the nonce construction and wrap limits
        described in 
        <xref target="security-mode"/>
        .
      
      </t>
      
      
      <t>
        
        Implementations should also consider UDP robustness guidelines
        (
        <xref target="RFC8085"/>
        ) and rate-limiting to mitigate amplification
        and resource-exhaustion attacks.
      
      </t>
      
    
    </section>
    

    
    <section title="Implementation Status">
      
      
      <t>
        
        This section is provided for RFC 7942 compliance (
        <xref target="RFC7942"/>
        ).
        Implementations, interop notes, and known limitations will be added in
        subsequent versions.
      
      </t>
      
    
    </section>
    

    
  </middle>
  

  
  <back>
    
    
    <references title="Normative References">
      
      
      <reference anchor="RFC1350">
        
        
        <front>
          
          
          <title>The TFTP Protocol (Revision 2)</title>
          
          
          <author fullname="K. Sollins"/>
          
          
          <date year="1992" month="07"/>
          
        
        </front>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1350"/>
        
      
      </reference>
      

      
      <reference anchor="RFC2119">
        
        
        <front>
          
          
          <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
          
          
          <author fullname="S. Bradner"/>
          
          
          <date year="1997" month="03"/>
          
        
        </front>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
        
      
      </reference>
      

      
      <reference anchor="RFC8174">
        
        
        <front>
          
          
          <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
          
          
          <author fullname="B. Leiba"/>
          
          
          <date year="2017" month="05"/>
          
        
        </front>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
        
      
      </reference>
      

      
      <reference anchor="RFC2347">
        
        
        <front>
          
          
          <title>TFTP Option Extension</title>
          
          
          <author fullname="G. Malkin"/>
          
          
          <date year="1998" month="05"/>
          
        
        </front>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2347"/>
        
      
      </reference>
      

      
      <reference anchor="RFC2348">
        
        
        <front>
          
          
          <title>TFTP Blocksize Option</title>
          
          
          <author fullname="G. Malkin"/>
          
          
          <date year="1998" month="05"/>
          
        
        </front>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2348"/>
        
      
      </reference>
      

      
      <reference anchor="RFC2349">
        
        
        <front>
          
          
          <title>TFTP Timeout Interval and Transfer Size Options</title>
          
          
          <author fullname="G. Malkin"/>
          
          
          <date year="1998" month="05"/>
          
        
        </front>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2349"/>
        
      
      </reference>
      

      
      <reference anchor="RFC5116">
        
        
        <front>
          
          
          <title>An Interface and Algorithms for Authenticated Encryption</title>
          
          
          <author fullname="D. McGrew"/>
          
          
          <date year="2008" month="01"/>
          
        
        </front>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5116"/>
        
      
      </reference>
      

      
      <reference anchor="RFC5869">
        
        
        <front>
          
          
          <title>HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation Function (HKDF)</title>
          
          
          <author fullname="H. Krawczyk"/>
          
          
          <author fullname="P. Eronen"/>
          
          
          <date year="2010" month="05"/>
          
        
        </front>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5869"/>
        
      
      </reference>
      

      
      <reference anchor="RFC6335">
        
        
        <front>
          
          
          <title>Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry</title>
          
          
          <author fullname="M. Cotton"/>
          
          
          <author fullname="B. Leiba"/>
          
          
          <author fullname="T. Narten"/>
          
          
          <date year="2011" month="08"/>
          
        
        </front>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6335"/>
        
      
      </reference>
      

      
      <reference anchor="RFC8085">
        
        
        <front>
          
          
          <title>UDP Usage Guidelines</title>
          
          
          <author fullname="L. Eggert"/>
          
          
          <author fullname="G. Fairhurst"/>
          
          
          <author fullname="G. Shepherd"/>
          
          
          <date year="2017" month="03"/>
          
        
        </front>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8085"/>
        
      
      </reference>
      

      
      <reference anchor="RFC8126">
        
        
        <front>
          
          
          <title>Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs</title>
          
          
          <author fullname="M. Cotton"/>
          
          
          <author fullname="B. Leiba"/>
          
          
          <author fullname="T. Narten"/>
          
          
          <date year="2017" month="06"/>
          
        
        </front>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="26"/>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8126"/>
        
      
      </reference>
      
    
    </references>
    

    
    <references title="Informative References">
      
      
      <reference anchor="RFC7942">
        
        
        <front>
          
          
          <title>Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section</title>
          
          
          <author fullname="C. Bormann"/>
          
          
          <date year="2016" month="07"/>
          
        
        </front>
        
        
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7942"/>
        
      
      </reference>
      
    
    </references>
    
  
  </back>
  

</rfc>
